(no subject)
Feb. 13th, 2008 01:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Bush presses House on surveillance bill
This is really bothering me. Especially the retroactive immunity for telecoms. If they hadn't done anything illegal, why would this be necessary? I'm sure the reply would be "9/11 changed everything", but that's bullshit. Nobody is above the law, least of all the people that are supposed to enforce it. 9/11 did not change that.
terrorists are planning new attacks on our country ... that will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison
I smell fearmongering! I have no doubt that this is true, but it has always been true. And your cat is planning to poop in your shoes, and your neighbor is thinking of different ways he could fuck your wife. We don't let these things consume us, and we can't. As I've said before, more people die from heart disease every couple of days than died in 9/11 over 6 years ago. Get a grip!
This is really bothering me. Especially the retroactive immunity for telecoms. If they hadn't done anything illegal, why would this be necessary? I'm sure the reply would be "9/11 changed everything", but that's bullshit. Nobody is above the law, least of all the people that are supposed to enforce it. 9/11 did not change that.
terrorists are planning new attacks on our country ... that will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison
I smell fearmongering! I have no doubt that this is true, but it has always been true. And your cat is planning to poop in your shoes, and your neighbor is thinking of different ways he could fuck your wife. We don't let these things consume us, and we can't. As I've said before, more people die from heart disease every couple of days than died in 9/11 over 6 years ago. Get a grip!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 06:43 pm (UTC)Right on!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 06:58 pm (UTC)Normally, when an act is changed to make an act legal, we're all over the idea of making it apply retroactively. This time, not so much.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:34 pm (UTC)supposedly we are in the middle east "fighting" against this kind of governance, and i thought you claim to support that fight?
if laws were broken here, and those who broke the laws (Bush and the telecompanies in tandem) are given a free pass, this country no longer is about the idea that no man is above the law, a concept we went through an impeachment proceeding to test just a few years ago. Now those same people who pushed for that want to look the other way when it comes to Bush.
Pathetic.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:36 pm (UTC)The Bush admin. has radically altered this concept, bud. We both know it.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:55 pm (UTC)I'm perfectly comfortable pretending otherwise ^_^
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:59 pm (UTC)If this is truly the life-or-death clash between civilizations that they claim, then it's their patriotic duty to defend us by catching and convicting the bad guys through the proper channels.
Fighting thuggery as a concept by means of thuggery is kind of lol.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 06:43 am (UTC)Although there are no laws being bent and spindled here, but I think Democrats use fear mongering to get people to fear not getting Health services and try to get universal health care in to law. Not having healthcare means "little sally can't fall down because she won't get helped at the hospital unless she is insured."
no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 07:06 am (UTC)Besides I doubt if any of your rights were violated. No one in the FBI/gov't saw the naked pix you keep sending me. :D Stop Sending me naked pix!
As a socialist I would think you would welcome the community safety as the expense of individual rights.